Is Renoise dead?
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America
Good question. They never addressed the delays/latencies added to my Logic projects when using multiple instances of their sampler plugin, either...
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud
my music @ SoundCloud
-
- KVRian
- 925 posts since 14 Dec, 2014
There was a update like a month ago.
https://forum.renoise.com/index.php/top ... x-release/
But they sure make a piss-poor job of communicating that on their site (heard of it on twitter).
https://forum.renoise.com/index.php/top ... x-release/
But they sure make a piss-poor job of communicating that on their site (heard of it on twitter).
- Banned
- 11467 posts since 4 Jan, 2017 from Warsaw, Poland
It looks that way, although it begs the question - what is it you need added that's within the tracker paradigm? If you think about piano-roll, horizontal tracks with waveform display, etc. non-tracker stuff, I guess the devs stance on that was pretty clear: those won't happen.classic wrote:There wasn't an update or upgrade since..........
Did they stop developing it?
-
- Banned
- 453 posts since 30 Mar, 2016
Per-track pattern length - see Buzz for the correct implementation. That's actually the biggest drawback of Renoise - or should I say design flaw?antic604 wrote:it begs the question - what is it you need added that's within the tracker paradigm?
Other than that, it may be a tracker, but it's also an audio processing app and a host, so - routing, sidechain. How do you make a full mix without sidechain? Use another host? Track meters are very basic. Effects are of early '00s quality (=shit).
Could come up with a longer list, but can't be arsed, if they can't be arsed to keep working on their software. I'm a legit user for two complete version numbers - bought a license for up to and including version 4. They released 3 and stopped development. Which means that they effectively stole my money for one full version number.
- Banned
- 11467 posts since 4 Jan, 2017 from Warsaw, Poland
Oh, this I agree with 100% although it's a complete revamping of the software, from pattern-based workflow to track-based. The sequencer and continuous pattern view and automation editing were introduced to make that less painful.sfxsound3 wrote:Per-track pattern length - see Buzz for the correct implementation. That's actually the biggest drawback of Renoise - or should I say design flaw?
You can route audio to send tracks, you can use Signal Follower on one track to trigger the compressor somewhere else, not sure if and how it works for VSTs. Sure, it's basic functionality, but it is there.sfxsound3 wrote:Other than that, it may be a tracker, but it's also an audio processing app and a host, so - routing, sidechain. How do you make a full mix without sidechain? Use another host? Track meters are very basic. Effects are of early '00s quality (=shit).
That's a wrong mindset. No. You paid for what's in version 3.x, with *extra benefit* of getting everyting up to 4.x for free. Why would you - in your head - "pay" for things that you don't know if and when they're coming and that you have no idea if they'd be of any use to you?sfxsound3 wrote:Could come up with a longer list, but can't be arsed, if they can't be arsed to keep working on their software. I'm a legit user for two complete version numbers - bought a license for up to and including version 4. They released 3 and stopped development. Which means that they effectively stole my money for one full version number.
And come on, Renoise costs 68EUR - that's less than most plugins.
- Banned
- 11467 posts since 4 Jan, 2017 from Warsaw, Poland
No, you're entitled to get it free if and when it ever comes out with whatever features it has. AFAIK there's no official (or unofficial) road map with release schedule and feature list. No DAW does it.sfxsound3 wrote:Erm, it's not an 'extra benefit'. I own Renoise 4. It's not irrelevant to me if it comes tomorrow with all the features I need, after 10 years of waiting, or never.
If you're going in with that mindset, then you're setting yourself for disappointment.
But sure, to each his own - feel free to feel "robbed" of your money...
And don't buy Bitwig - that's even more of a "scam"
- KVRian
- 985 posts since 23 Oct, 2009 from Italy
If you need updates every second day just buy Reaper
12 years old PC running :Reaper;Reason;Dune;Zampler;Kontakr;Reaktor;and many others countless vst
-
- KVRist
- 169 posts since 9 Dec, 2006
Staying within the tracker/pattern matrix paradigm, can they even come up with enough "new" core features to justify a v4?
I definitely can't see them adding synths, updated effects, gigs of samples and loops, a hardware controller, a subscription model, licensing zynaptique time stretching, video player, etc...
If the top 25 minor features were added that would probably be a .5 update.
I definitely can't see them adding synths, updated effects, gigs of samples and loops, a hardware controller, a subscription model, licensing zynaptique time stretching, video player, etc...
If the top 25 minor features were added that would probably be a .5 update.
-
- KVRAF
- 3056 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
pottering wrote:There was a update like a month ago.
https://forum.renoise.com/index.php/top ... x-release/
But they sure make a piss-poor job of communicating that on their site (heard of it on twitter).
yeah.. there was _just_ an update. also he's active on social media and posts stuff all the time about contests and sound packs and new renoise tools etc.
- KVRAF
- 25852 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Good point to follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/renoise
They post frequently.
https://twitter.com/renoise/status/915591939323547648
They post frequently.
https://twitter.com/renoise/status/915591939323547648
-
- KVRian
- 537 posts since 23 Jan, 2008 from Hamburg, Germany
There is a bit of truth in there.
There is always room for improvement but Renoise as a tracker is almost as good as a tracker can be. Most of the suggested workflow additions will only wrap other paradigms over the tracker interface and that will IMHO destroy the entire experience. Trackers produce a certain result for me because they force me to work a certain way. With an easy to reach piano roll I'll automatically start to paint music again because it's faster and easier and in the end I'll produce the same songs and sounds as in a linear DAW. Having options is not always a good thing (at least for me).
What is really needed for the next big version is a quality upgrade with higher quality effects and modernized filters. The sampler needs some more modern features like articulations, wave table support and grain synthesis functions. The would also transform Redux from a good sampler to a real sound machine.
There is always room for improvement but Renoise as a tracker is almost as good as a tracker can be. Most of the suggested workflow additions will only wrap other paradigms over the tracker interface and that will IMHO destroy the entire experience. Trackers produce a certain result for me because they force me to work a certain way. With an easy to reach piano roll I'll automatically start to paint music again because it's faster and easier and in the end I'll produce the same songs and sounds as in a linear DAW. Having options is not always a good thing (at least for me).
What is really needed for the next big version is a quality upgrade with higher quality effects and modernized filters. The sampler needs some more modern features like articulations, wave table support and grain synthesis functions. The would also transform Redux from a good sampler to a real sound machine.