Log InCreate An Account
  1. Plugins
  2. »
  3. Acoustica
  4. »
  5. Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio
  6. »
  7. Reviews

Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio

Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio has an average user rating of 4.67 from 3 reviews

Rate & Review Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio

User Reviews by KVR Members for Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio

Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio

Reviewed By New Media Supply [all]
August 31st, 2022
Version reviewed: 9.0 on Windows

I am using Mixcraft (Recording Studio) for about a month extensively, and there was no need (for me) to read any of the documentation. I used Mulab and Reaper before. Mulab is nice but has its limitations. Reaper is also nice, but it feels like there are too many whistles, and the plugins (js) UI turns me off.

Mixcraft has some awesome tools built in. For example, I love the compressors (try the TB bus compressor) and TB de-esser. There are also synths like Messiah, Journey, VB3 organ (my favorites), and more instruments.

The UI is fine to me (1920x1080), and the program works stable. I have 600 VST plugins, and all are working fine.

Some people claim that DAWs have each their sound (like one is warmer or brighter than the other one), but that is a myth. So I would choose a DAW according to price, stability, workflow, capabilities, etc.

Yes, it's a nice DAW, and I hope Mixcraft will do well in the coming years.

Robert.

Read Review

Click here to read all 3 reviews

Comments & Discussion for Acoustica Mixcraft 10.5 Recording Studio

Discussion
Discussion: Active
original flipper
original flipper
3 April 2017 at 11:00am

Hi.

I agree that Mix craft is a pretty intuitive program to use - the mixer EQ could be a bit more flexibile beyond the 3 bands covered.

Anyways - nice review, a change from the 1 line 'this is great software' reviews that often pop up here.

BeatProducer
BeatProducer
25 February 2019 at 3:41am

I like Mixcraft because before when I was using FL Studio it was just too much extra stuff foe me to deal with, messing with channel racks and having to always try to remember to click in another pattern for the next virtual instrument parts, or I'd end up with some inconvenient problem.. All that was slowing down my creativity and I felt I needed to get back to a DAW that was simular enough to the past DAW's I've used that I had gotten so use to, and was quite enough more nice and easier to compose, mix, and master beats in. I found Mixcraft really quite enough easier for me to the point, that I've been moving along nicely with making beats in it. The time it's taking me to make a beat now in Mixcraft some music production software producers would probably still think to be long, but it's really still quite enough faster for sure than it was taking me in FL Studio. I'm also so glad that most of my sound processing and virtual instrument vst' plugins also work in Mixcraft.

Please log in to join the discussion