This is the problem with being a DAW software company. For over 10 years, all I heard was the whole world screaming that if Reason just had VST capability it would rule. Then they introduce VST and everyone wines about not having VST3. Then they refine and release VST3 capability(all while doing a complete graphical overhaul I might add) and people say it was better as a closed system.BrokenTrance wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 6:02 pmGreat post. Probably you are correct also.eerie_audio wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:18 pmYou have no clue what you're talking about. It didn't go downhill when record was released, that was the beginning of integrating audio recording into Reason in the following versions. And that started their rapid growth as everyone started taking notice and accepting it as a full fledged DAW. They were so profitable they were able to design and release their own audio interface, before everyone and their mom did. It's sad when people try to blur history just to make a point.gentleclockdivider wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 11:28 am Cutting edge ?
That was exactly the moment went everyhing went downhill ---> the release of record .
No midi output , and you had to have reason to use it's instruments in side record , Needless to say , Record was a flop .and thus integrated in in reason 6.0 ( + rack extensions )
Propllerheads have been behind the curve for a verry loong time
I think it went downhill with the introduction to be able to use vst. Then people started looking - this vst sounds really good. And this too. And this! Then they started exploring other daws, because the DAW of Reason was maybe a bit lacking? I am just speculating here. Nah. They should have stopped with RE. They really had something going i think. Then they should have gone all out on improving the DAW. Anyway.....
I myself agree with you and never wanted VST support personally but im just saying being a modern day DAW company would make me pull my hair out.